Successful knowledge transfer within offshore supplier networks: a case study exploring social capital in strategic alliances. Open- source software - Wikipedia. Open- source software (OSS) is computer software with its source code made available with a license in which the copyright holder provides the rights to study, change, and distribute the software to anyone and for any purpose.[1] Open- source software may be developed in a collaborative public manner. According to scientists who studied it, open- source software is a prominent example of open collaboration.[2] The term is often written without a hyphen as "open source software".[3][4][5]Open- source software development, or collaborative development from multiple independent sources, generates an increasingly more diverse scope of design perspective than any one company is capable of developing and sustaining long term. A 2. 00. 8 report by the Standish Group states that adoption of open- source software models has resulted in savings of about $6. History[edit]End of 1. Foundation of the Open Source Initiative[edit]In the early days of computing, programmers and developers shared software in order to learn from each other and evolve the field of computing. Eventually the open source notion moved to the way side of commercialization of software in the years 1. In 1. 99. 7, Eric Raymond published The Cathedral and the Bazaar, a reflective analysis of the hacker community and free software principles. The paper received significant attention in early 1. Netscape Communications Corporation to release their popular Netscape Communicator Internet suite as free software. ![]() ![]() This source code subsequently became the basis behind Sea. Monkey, Mozilla Firefox, Thunderbird and Kompo. Zer. Netscape's act prompted Raymond and others to look into how to bring the Free Software Foundation's free software ideas and perceived benefits to the commercial software industry. On fol. 899v of the Codex Atlanticus Leonardo sketched a few patterns now called ‘reciprocal frames’ that have been studied in depth. Elsewhere we have. They concluded that FSF's social activism was not appealing to companies like Netscape, and looked for a way to rebrand the free software movement to emphasize the business potential of sharing and collaborating on software source code.[8] The new term they chose was "open source", which was soon adopted by Bruce Perens, publisher Tim O'Reilly, Linus Torvalds, and others. The Open Source Initiative was founded in February 1. While the Open Source Initiative sought to encourage the use of the new term and evangelize the principles it adhered to, commercial software vendors found themselves increasingly threatened by the concept of freely distributed software and universal access to an application's source code. A Microsoft executive publicly stated in 2. I can't imagine something that could be worse than this for the software business and the intellectual- property business."[1. However, while FOSS has historically played a role outside of the mainstream of private software development, companies as large as Microsoft have begun to develop official open- source presences on the Internet. IBM, Oracle, Google and State Farm are just a few of the companies with a serious public stake in today's competitive open- source market. There has been a significant shift in the corporate philosophy concerning the development of FOSS.[1. The free software movement was launched in 1. In 1. 99. 8, a group of individuals advocated that the term free software should be replaced by open- source software (OSS) as an expression which is less ambiguous[1. Software developers may want to publish their software with an open- source license, so that anybody may also develop the same software or understand its internal functioning. With open- source software, generally anyone is allowed to create modifications of it, port it to new operating systems and instruction set architectures, share it with others or, in some cases, market it. Scholars Casson and Ryan have pointed out several policy- based reasons for adoption of open source – in particular, the heightened value proposition from open source (when compared to most proprietary formats) in the following categories: Security. Affordability. Transparency. Perpetuity. Interoperability. Flexibility. Localization—particularly in the context of local governments (who make software decisions). Casson and Ryan argue that "governments have an inherent responsibility and fiduciary duty to taxpayers" which includes the careful analysis of these factors when deciding to purchase proprietary software or implement an open- source option.[1. The Open Source Definition, notably, presents an open- source philosophy, and further defines the terms of use, modification and redistribution of open- source software.
Software licenses grant rights to users which would otherwise be reserved by copyright law to the copyright holder. Several open- source software licenses have qualified within the boundaries of the Open Source Definition. The most prominent and popular example is the GNU General Public License (GPL), which "allows free distribution under the condition that further developments and applications are put under the same licence", thus also free.[1. The open source label came out of a strategy session held on April 7, 1. Palo Alto in reaction to Netscape's January 1. Navigator (as Mozilla). A group of individuals at the session included Tim O'Reilly, Linus Torvalds, Tom Paquin, Jamie Zawinski, Larry Wall, Brian Behlendorf, Sameer Parekh, Eric Allman, Greg Olson, Paul Vixie, John Ousterhout, Guido van Rossum, Philip Zimmermann, John Gilmore and Eric S. Raymond.[1. 8] They used the opportunity before the release of Navigator's source code to clarify a potential confusion caused by the ambiguity of the word "free" in English. Many people claimed that the birth of the Internet, since 1. The Free Software Foundation (FSF), started in 1. Since a great deal of free software already was (and still is) free of charge, such free software became associated with zero cost, which seemed anti- commercial.[8]The Open Source Initiative (OSI) was formed in February 1. Eric Raymond and Bruce Perens. With at least 2. 0 years of evidence from case histories of closed software development versus open development already provided by the Internet developer community, the OSI presented the "open source" case to commercial businesses, like Netscape. The OSI hoped that the use of the label "open source", a term suggested by Peterson of the Foresight Institute at the strategy session, would eliminate ambiguity, particularly for individuals who perceive "free software" as anti- commercial. They sought to bring a higher profile to the practical benefits of freely available source code, and they wanted to bring major software businesses and other high- tech industries into open source. Perens attempted to register "open source" as a service mark for the OSI, but that attempt was impractical by trademark standards. Meanwhile, due to the presentation of Raymond's paper to the upper management at Netscape—Raymond only discovered when he read the Press Release,[2. Netscape CEO Jim Barksdale's PA later in the day—Netscape released its Navigator source code as open source, with favorable results.[2. Definitions[edit]The Open Source Initiative's (OSI) definition is recognized by governments internationally[2. In addition, many of the world's largest open source software projects and contributors, including Debian, Drupal Association, Free. BSD Foundation, Linux Foundation, Mozilla Foundation, Wikimedia Foundation, Wordpress Foundation have committed[2. OSI's mission and Open Source Definition through the OSI Affiliate Agreement.[2. OSI uses The Open Source Definition to determine whether it considers a software license open source. The definition was based on the Debian Free Software Guidelines, written and adapted primarily by Perens.[2. Perens did not base his writing on the "four freedoms" from the Free Software Foundation (FSF), which were only widely available later.[2. Under Perens' definition, open source describes a broad general type of software license that makes source code available to the general public with relaxed or non- existent restrictions on the use and modification of the code. It is an explicit "feature" of open source that it puts very few restrictions on the use or distribution by any organization or user, in order to enable the rapid evolution of the software.[2. Despite initially accepting it,[3. Richard Stallman of the FSF now flatly opposes the term "Open Source" being applied to what they refer to as "free software".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |